rhill - ICANNWatch User

[ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

rhill (3320)

rhill
(email not shown publicly)
http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/

Richard Hill

rhill's Comments

TSB Circular 96 Sunday June 04 2006, @11:05PM Score:1
   attached to ITU Reaches Out to ccTLDs
Sherman Act Thursday October 09 2003, @12:10AM Replies:2 Score:1
   attached to Is VeriSign Contemplating a Sherman Act Claim Against ICANN?
What about telephone numbers Tuesday September 16 2003, @01:47AM Replies:2 Score:1
   attached to Verisign typo-squats
ITU-T and ENUM Friday August 29 2003, @12:49AM Score:1
   attached to Does ENUM make any sense?
A few global rules Friday June 13 2003, @12:52AM Replies:1 Score:1
   attached to Springtime for ICANN
A balanced view Thursday May 29 2003, @12:17AM Score:1
   attached to Sky is Falling: Asia 'Running Out' of IPv4 Numbers
ITU-T ccTLD Workshop Wednesday April 16 2003, @03:05AM Replies:1 Score:1
   attached to ICANN Publishes First Quarter 2003 Propaganda Report to the U.S. DoC
The Study is from Nominum, not ITU Wednesday February 26 2003, @01:42AM Score:3, Informative
   attached to ITU's ccTLD DNS Survey Finds Many Errors
ITU's information on ENUM trials Monday January 13 2003, @01:12AM Score:2, Funny
   attached to ENUM Testing In Full Swing
Re: Any assurances that ITU is any better? Tuesday November 05 2002, @05:42AM Score:1
   attached to Thoughts on those Empty Seats
Re: Thoughts on those Empty Seats Tuesday November 05 2002, @02:44AM Score:1
   attached to Thoughts on those Empty Seats
Re: Thoughts on those Empty Seats Monday November 04 2002, @10:19PM Replies:2 Score:1
   attached to Thoughts on those Empty Seats
Re: ENUM: Parsing Hype From Hope Thursday October 10 2002, @05:29AM Replies:1 Score:1
   attached to ENUM: Parsing Hype From Hope
Re: ICANN's Next Steps Monday September 23 2002, @10:11PM Replies:1 Score:1
   attached to ICANN's Next Steps
Re: So, Why not the ITU? Sunday August 18 2002, @11:14PM Replies:1 Score:1
   attached to So, Why not the ITU?
Re: ICANN Executive Committee Votes Funds to GAC Friday August 16 2002, @05:12AM Replies:1 Score:1
   attached to ICANN Executive Committee Votes Funds to GAC
Re: OpenDemocracy Interviews Esther Dyson Thursday August 15 2002, @10:46PM Score:1
   attached to OpenDemocracy Interviews Esther Dyson
Re: ITU Tutorial on IPv6 Tuesday April 23 2002, @09:44PM Score:1
   attached to ITU Tutorial on IPv6
Re: The Case for Competitive ENUM Wednesday April 17 2002, @07:15AM Score:1
   attached to The Case for Competitive ENUM

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com