Cerf's response to Teare | Saturday July 24 2004, @04:44PM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to Keith Teare's Iconoclastic Take on the SiteFinder Report |
Report misses the point: Verisign hijacked names | Sunday July 11 2004, @12:41AM | | Score:3, Insightful |
attached to SSAC releases Sitefinder report |
TCP & IP are two layers | Friday March 19 2004, @03:26PM | | Score:1 |
attached to DARPA Wants to Re-Do the Internet |
Domain hijacking is the offense, not SiteFinder | Friday December 05 2003, @09:06AM | | Score:1 |
attached to Why it's time to rein in ICANN |
Re:We can have competition now, without ICANN's he | Wednesday October 08 2003, @08:09PM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to .museum's Awfully Defensive Statement on Its Wildcard |
We can have competition now, without ICANN's help | Wednesday October 08 2003, @10:25AM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to .museum's Awfully Defensive Statement on Its Wildcard |
Who has the authority to bind a domain name? | Wednesday October 08 2003, @09:57AM | | Score:1 |
attached to .museum's Awfully Defensive Statement on Its Wildcard |
Dodge political battles with technical fixes | Friday October 03 2003, @12:20PM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to VeriSign Caves, For Now |
We can "route around" Verisign | Wednesday September 24 2003, @12:14PM | | Score:1 |
attached to Security and Stability Advisory Committee Recommendations |
dotDNS is a partial solution to hijacking | Thursday September 18 2003, @11:30AM | | Score:1 |
attached to Verisign typo-squats |
Handles dodge semantics, complementing the semanti | Monday August 05 2002, @01:32PM | | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
It's not to save money, it's to provide more total | Monday August 05 2002, @01:15PM | | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Pointer to details | Sunday August 04 2002, @05:10PM | | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Please identify yourself for credit | Saturday August 03 2002, @05:20AM | | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Internet Draft on a handle system | Saturday August 03 2002, @05:15AM | | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Re: Working out details of decentralized handle se | Friday August 02 2002, @07:10PM | | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Working out details of decentralized handle servic | Friday August 02 2002, @11:37AM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
New layer, but little or no increase in latency | Thursday August 01 2002, @04:16PM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Frankston's article is very helpful | Thursday August 01 2002, @03:46PM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
PUIs (handles) do not replace names, they unbundl | Thursday August 01 2002, @03:38PM | Replies:1 | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Telephone numbers vs. domain names vs. other mnemo | Thursday August 01 2002, @09:51AM | Replies:2 | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |
Re: Building the alternative to DNS | Thursday August 01 2002, @09:33AM | | Score:1 |
attached to Building the alternative to DNS |