Registry contracts secretly amended and extended
Date: Tuesday June 26 2007, @03:30PM
Topic: ICANN Staff and Structure

ehasbrouck writes "In response to my comments in the public forum on registry failure plans, and on the GA list, ICANN Chief gTLD Registry Liaison Craig Schwartz has revealed that ICANN has "granted" secret amendments to extend the .AERO, .COOP and .MUSEUM sTLD agreements.

In a follow-up, I point out that any such secret "grant", without the procedures required by the Bylaws (notice of the proposal, public comment, notice of the Board agenda, Board vote, etc.) is null and void, and should be reconsidered "de novo", according to the procedures required by the Bylaws."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Registry contracts secretly amended and extended | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
Click this button to post a comment to this story
The options below will change how the comments display
Threshold:
Check box to change your default comment view
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Harkens back to 1999...
by KarlAuerbach on Wednesday June 27 2007, @03:24PM (#16956)
User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
This situation has a predecessor:

Back in 1999 ICANN entered into an agreement with Network Soltions (before it evolved into Verisign) under which ICANN began its series of gifts unto Verisign.

That agreement was made with complete disregard of the clearly defined processes in ICANN's bylaws.

I complained -

http://www.cavebear.com/archive/icann/reconsiderat ion_req.htm
[cavebear.com] - but was rejected, as were all such complaints - by ICANN's reconsideration committee.

I filed a request for indepenedent review - which was lost because ICANN diddled around and never bothered to create a review panel.

I still believe that my compaint is valid and, if so, then the entire chain of agreements with Verisign should be considered null.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 7 replies beneath your current threshold.




  • This article comes from ICANNWatch
    http://www.icannwatch.org/

    The URL for this story is:
    http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/26/2330257