Noncommercial Evaluation Team Ranks Unity Bid First, IMS second
Date: Tuesday August 20 2002, @06:32AM
Topic: .org

ICANN management asked a group drawn from the Noncommercial Domain Name Holders Constituency (NCDNHC) to independently assess three aspects of the.org applications: 1) Differentiation of the domain, 2) Responsiveness to noncommercial users in terms of its governance structure and policies, and 3) Degree of public support from noncommercial users. In the NCDNHC report, the Unity Registry bid ranked first in two of the categories (differentiation and responsiveness/governance) and second in the third (public support). The Internet Multicasting Service/Internet Software Consortium ranked first in public support.

The Internet Society ranked third in public support, third in governance, and fifth in differentiation. While ISOC ranked in the first tier of the final rankings, it was pretty far behind Unity in the overall rankings. And, depending on the evaluation method used, it was neck and neck with the IMS/ISC bid. Of course, the NCDNHC considered only some of the evaluation criteria. It did not consider technical factors or competition policy considerations. However from a competition policyt standpoint, reassigning .org to Unity would be more pro-competitive than to ISOC, because ISOC relies on Afilias, an incumbent who has already been given control of a popular gTLD, and which is owned by the dominant registrars. And from a technical standpoint, the IMS/ISC bid was very strong. I hope that public discussion and debate of the staff report will bring out the relative strengths and weaknesses of the three top contenders: Unity, ISOC and IMS/ISC.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Noncommercial Evaluation Team Ranks Unity Bid First, IMS second | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 6 comments | Search Discussion
Click this button to post a comment to this story
The options below will change how the comments display
Threshold:
Check box to change your default comment view
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Re: Incensed by
by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday August 20 2002, @07:15PM (#8611)
User #2810 Info
It isn't all about money. That is precisely the point. The internet wasn't originally designed or built with the profit motive in mind and it worked very well. It was only when the profit motive entered into it that it became a mess. It is those who share your view who are ensuring that it will become a bigger mess. -g
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
OT
by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday August 20 2002, @07:52PM (#8614)
User #2810 Info
Excellent points made on your linked post to the GA list Richard. What a litany of failure both Afilias and ICANN have been. One wonders what will become of .org now. BTW, when you yourself post to the GA list you post to GA-full. That doesn't get to the regular GA list so many folks who subscribe to the regular list miss your posts (a considerable loss IMHO). If instead you post to GA proper it will go both to the GA list and also to the GA-full list, thus getting both sets of subscribers. But it doesn't work the other way around. -g
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.




  • This article comes from ICANNWatch
    http://www.icannwatch.org/

    The URL for this story is:
    http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=02/08/20/103244