UnityRegistry bid for .ORG
Date: Monday June 10 2002, @03:35AM
Topic: .org

Anonymous writes "Unity Registry, a new joint venture between UK-based Poptel, registry operator for the .coop global Top Level Domain (gTLD), and AusRegistry, operator of the all the current .au country code domains (ccTLD), will be launched on Monday 10th June 2002. The new Unity Registry global partnership will bid for the .org Top Level Internet domain."

The launch announcement will be made at a meeting in Geneva of major intergovernmental and non-governmental agencies in the .org namespace. This is one of a series of consultation meetings Poptel is conducting on the .org divestiture issue.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
UnityRegistry bid for .ORG | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 11 comments | Search Discussion
Click this button to post a comment to this story
The options below will change how the comments display
Threshold:
Check box to change your default comment view
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Re: UnityRegistry bid for .ORG
by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Monday June 10 2002, @06:37AM (#7053)
User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
Who really cares? The new operator of .ORG will be selected from among the inside players. I dare say that the new operator already knows who they are.

This is just an excuse for ICANN to inject itself into the roll of regulator and make another windfall in $35,000 application fees from applicants who should know that they have no chance.

++Peter
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Re: UnityRegistry bid for .ORG
by Robert_Burbidge on Monday June 10 2002, @04:38AM (#7045)
User #3394 Info
What's your reasoning for that? Does a US-based company or consortium automatically mean better service?
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Re: UnityRegistry bid for .ORG
by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Monday June 10 2002, @06:14AM (#7050)
User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
.org is an international TLD; why does it need to stay in the US?

The US somehow managed a takeover of .edu, which had been an international TLD (and is documented that way in RFC 1591) but somehow became US-only and was transferred in management by the U.S. government without ICANN involvement, apparently. Are you proposing the same be done with .org?
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.




  • This article comes from ICANNWatch
    http://www.icannwatch.org/

    The URL for this story is:
    http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/10/073531