Salon interview with Karl
Date: Tuesday March 19 2002, @04:27AM
Topic: Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions

Anonymous writes "Damien Cave from has an interview with Karl Auerbach. It is a good read and really gets to the bottom of the whole lawsuit."

It's plain to see that Karl is determined to expose ICANN for what it is.

[MF: sample exchange-

Cave: Is there anything in the [Lynn] plan that's useful?
Auerbach: I think it would make great kindling for a fire. There's nothing in it that's useful.]

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Salon interview with Karl | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 22 comments | Search Discussion
Click this button to post a comment to this story
The options below will change how the comments display
Check box to change your default comment view
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
ICANN's Lynn, Cerf, and Davidson respond
by fnord ( on Tuesday March 19 2002, @08:25AM (#5397)
User #2810 Info
ICANN has posted an announcement regarding the suit. Save it for court guys, your credibility is approaching zero. -g
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Re: Salon interview with Karl
by fnord ( on Tuesday March 19 2002, @06:16PM (#5416)
User #2810 Info
True so far as it goes t, but perhaps he was having a bad day, or perhaps back then he was one of those commentators who still felt the need to cut ICANN some slack, but have since wised up. I am thinking in particular of the Register UK (now with a US edition), which was content to accept the ICANN party line back then, but is now one of its more biting critics.

Cave has also been more critical of ICANN since that time, perhaps his earlier interview with Karl just over a fortnight after publication of his New Republic Online article fed him a clue. -g

[ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • This article comes from ICANNWatch

    The URL for this story is: