ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    VeriSign still locking domains/ICANN diverting complaints | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: VeriSign still locking domains/ICANN diverting
    by Consumernet on Saturday February 02 2002, @02:10AM (#4794)
    User #2897 Info
    I am very familiar with the FTC and their activities here in DC. I have testified at two of their public hearings over the past several years (Internet privacy and Telemarketing Sales Rules). The FTC is mostly "smoke and mirrors." They have a staff who is mostly concerned about getting a job with the Direct Marketing Association after they leave.


    As for the examples you give of "enforcement action" all they do is go after small violators because they know it won't hurt their relationship with their lobbyists friends (like VeriSign). During the period you discuss the FTC received several serious privacy complaints against companies like Microsoft, AOL, and the like. However, they did get around to taking "enforcement action" on someone who registered 41 variation of the spelling of Britney Spears.


    I actually filed a complaint with the FTC concerning the John Zuccarini complaint. The news release and associated complaints was full of false information and ridiculous claims made by the FTC. Their Trademark infringement claims do not take into account well-known court decisions such as the Holiday Inns Inc. v. 800 Reservation Inc case

    http://www.law.emory.edu/pub-cgi/print_hit_bold.pl/6circuit/june96/96a0179p.06.html

    They also claimed "the FTC estimates that the defendant earns between $800,000 and $1 million annually from his scheme." In fact the FTC didn't estimate anything. This estimate came from an accusation made by a lawyer representing a company suing Zuccarini. that statement was made in court after Zuccarini defaulted. The claim is ridiculous.


    The FTC will never take action against Verisign for these activities.


    Russ Smith

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: VeriSign still locking domains/ICANN diverting by Consumernet


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com