| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
UDRP Panel Issues Catch-22 Ruling On Reverse Domain Hi-Jacking
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 19 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
The arbitrator is wrong. It should consider reverse domain name hijacking and opine accordingly.
With that said, however, the rule regarding RDNH is lame. The only remedy the UDRP allows is domain name transfer. The respondent can never win damages or other relief. Accordingly, attempted RDNH is irrelevant. The only relevent factor is the respondent's bad faith. Sad but true.
The arbitrator in this case recognizes that fact, and decided to unilaterally re-write the UDRP rule. The arbitrator is wrong. But, so is the UDRP.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
 |
Perhaps the Panel felt this wasn't a clear RDNH case. The UDRP is good and much better than the alternative: letting squatters run wild on the Internet and ignore law. However, panels need to weigh each side of the issue, and if RDNH exists, come on out and say it.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
 |
It's a shame. It's shame to have those in the panel.
i personally prefer to have a "jury" to make the judgement
rather than a couple of panelists. ICANN can use a company of volunteers. When a case is delivered to WIPO or another organization, ICANN ramdonly choose 6 to 10 people to make the judgement. When both parties present their arguements, I am sure ordinary people can make their judgement right. It does not need to take a DJ to make the job. Remember is not an arument of trademark rights. It's about the UDRP, which is simple as ABC to any person whose IQ is above 68.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - Re: ICANN
by ANNODOMINI2000
Monday May 13 2002, @01:58AM
- Re: ICANN
by Anonymous
Monday May 13 2002, @03:05AM
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|