ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    WIPO arbitration on neo-nazi use of domain names | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 12 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: WIPO arbitration on neo-nazi use of domain nam
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Wednesday January 30 2002, @08:12PM (#4769)
    User #2810 Info
    I sure wish I could get worked up about some of these cases, but I can't. I don't see where this is a free speech issue at all, unless one could make the case that the USG via ICANN via the UDRP is infringing on one of its citizen's Constitutional Rights, and if so, the Respondent is free to avail himself of US opportunites for redress. This ruling doesn't particularily lower the bar below that set by this decision regarding 31 domain names similar/identical to Canadian government departments.

    It isn't as though the Government of Germany was reaching out across national boundaries to claim names that the Respondent had a reasonable right to. Nor were they going transborder after a name that might have a restricted use in Germany like nazi.org.

    Free speech here is a red herring, the Respondent could have left the site non-resolving, or marked for sale, or put up a pr0n site, or sold Pokemon cards (such examples covering about 80% of extant .com names) and the same ruling would be equally relevant. Otherwise it just opens another loophole for all squatters to put up sites with some rant on them and claim that (their) freedom of speech is absolute. Look at martinlutherking.org, owned by a neo-nazi. Should his rights trump those of, say, the Martin Luther King estate? I don't think so.

    The Respondent in the current case hasn't been muzzled anyway, amongst other URLs he's still using the bundesinnenministerium sLD, this time in ICANN's shiny new .biz extension (you know, the TLD that was going to be like an up-market .com, motto: nothing personal, just business ...ya right) as a throwaway pointer to his main site (like another 10% of the .com space).

    BTW, the Respondent in the Canadian case, AKA the Domain Baron, AKA the Athiest Messiah (perhaps Joe Baptista or another alt root could interest him in no.g*d), at least put up a game self-defence (Canuck spelling). Is it just me, or is ICANNWatching becoming increasingly theological?

    Seriously though folks, I'm much more interested in the US Federal Judge's ruling in the US Court Thumps UDRP cello.com case than in nitpicking for, or against, those who won't play nice. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Other contexts in which Germany intervenes on the
    by BenEdelman on Thursday October 24 2002, @07:53PM (#9831)
    User #3219 Info | http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/edelman
    Fascinating situation.

    Just today, I happened to release a somewhat related document re exclusions from google.de and google.fr (the German and French versions of Google). Some 100+ sites (at least!) are excluded from one or both of these sitse -- primarily neonazi, white supremacist, etc. content prohibited in Germany. Someone -- perhaps German government staff, perhaps someone else -- apparently affirmatively requested that Google remove each of these sites from its index (as the company only removes pages upon request, but apparently never on its own). The net result (see screenshot) is that the omitted search results simply disappear, while other (lower-ranked) results slide up to fill their places on the results listings.

    Read the report and test the exclusions for yourself.


    Ben Edelman

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: WIPO arbitration on neo-nazi use of domain nam
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Wednesday January 30 2002, @02:34AM (#4762)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    I don't see this as an extra-territoriality case. The "legitimate interests" should always be measured by the law of the forum of the registrant. Any other rule makes the UDRP an end-run around courts rather than the 'quicker, cheaper' COPY it was supposed to be. (This is because only the home state forum would have personal jurisdiciton over the registrant; no other court should take the case.)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: WIPO arbitration on neo-nazi use of domain nam
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Saturday February 02 2002, @07:00PM (#4800)
    User #2810 Info
    Basic info:

    Contact Type Registrant/Administrative/Billing/Technical:

    First Name CheapestRegistry.com
    Last Name $8.75 Domains

    ....[hey, I think we went to the same school ;) ]

    Address 1 Enter Here

    ...[That's what it says, hyperlink (back to them) and all]

    Address 2 Box 51094
    City Jacksonville Beach
    StateProvince FL
    PostalCode 32250
    Country US
    Phone 904-996-8251

    ...[that is a valid Jacksonville #]

    Fax
    EmailAddress info@CheapestRegistry.com

    status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
    nameserver: NS1.MYDOMAIN.COM
    NS2.MYDOMAIN.COM
    NS3.MYDOMAIN.COM
    NS4.MYDOMAIN.COM
    created-by: enom
    registration-expiration-date: 2003-01-01 09:35:12.0
    registrar: enom
    updated-by: enom
    created-date: 2001-01-01 09:35:12.0
    updated-date: 2001-12-29 06:55:45.0

    Traces to a direct marketer, name, address easily found. They seem to be an eNom reseller. Didja get spammed? If so, you could write to abuse@enom.com. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com