ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains With Sunrise Period. | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 40 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains Wi
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday September 25 2001, @07:39PM (#2513)
    User #2810 Info
    Anon writes:
    They have exclusive rights to the multilingual names other than the Verisign Internationalized Domain Names from what I hear...
    Where did you hear that and who did you hear it from? No-one, not even VeriSign, and certainly not XTNS, has exclusive rights to multilingual names.

    A few more questions. Is the XTNS ML system identical to the VeriSign ML system, or is it different? If the latter, in which way(s) is it different? Are the XTNS non-multilingual names first announced on August 15th and supposedly able to go functional 72 hours after registration functioning yet, or was it a typo that should have read 72 days? The last excuse given here some weeks ago was that Microsoft had made a change to its Internet Explorer browser that called up the MSN search page and that was interfering with XTNS. While MicroSoft did make such a change (which wasn't at the browser level) there was never any explanation, technical or otherwise, as to why that would interfere with XTNS. As XTNS uses the RealNames system, and as RealNames works with the modified IE, when will your non-ML names work? And speaking of RealNames, it seems they've given the exclusive right to Japanese to someone else. There is also no mention on the RealNames site of their relationship with XTNS, don't you find this curious?

    Finally, who are you? I'm willing to call XTNS a scam and put my name on it and risk being sued. You're just an anonymous shill selling the most recent version of XTNS vaporware. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains Wi by fnord
    Re: XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains Wi
    by Anonymous on Tuesday September 25 2001, @08:15PM (#2514)
    Hi fnord (what is your name by the way?). My name is Mike and I do not work for XTNS. I just dont take the time to sign in as a user. Call it a personal quirk.

    But I can tell you what I have been able to discover thus far: Yes the XTNS ML system is in all essential respects the same as the NSI ML system. Both use MS IE for resolution via the Realnames resolver servers. But they do not, as far as I can see, use the Realnames Keywords system: note that the ML names resolve much faster than keywords do. No bouncing around servers like Keywords or the early demo ASCII words from XTNS (if you saw any of those work).

    The ML seems to work entirely differently and has special MS code at the back end of IE to handle all ML domains. And they are handled the same for XTNS as for Verisign/NSI.

    Realnames haven't given exclusive rights to Japanese to those people: the story you link to is just about a representative they have appointed there to handle KEYWORDs. A totally different universe from the XTNS ML domains. From what I understand, Realnames themselves retained the rights to service JPNIC (for ml.jp in fully ml) and XTNS have exclusive rights over everything else Japanese that looks or smells like a domain name (whatever term they use to describe it). Similar deals in the other countries as I understand it from my contact at RealNames.

    As to XTNS and exclusivity, I think the writer was referring to the exclusive contract they have with Realnames. I agree not XTNS nor NSI nor anyone else has an exclusive on ML names as such. And I dont think that is what the write meant.

    As to your comment about vaporware, I do trust you noted that these XTNS ML words do work right now and there are examples on their site you can cut and paste into the Address Bar and see them work? Whatever went wrong with the launch of the ASCII names is really a pity if it got you thinking XTNS is less than it is. These guys are real, have substantial backing, and are all set to easily rival NSI or anyone else in the ML market. Moreover, their technology works and you can see it working this time (thank goodness).
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com