ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains With Sunrise Period. | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 40 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains Wi
    by Anonymous on Wednesday September 26 2001, @07:36AM (#2534)
    You flame people for being anon. They log in and your flame them for logging in. I and others will no doubt not log-in in future given your attitude and behavior on this board.

    So, one in several million fnords, you write:

    Oh I see. So I have to change my character set each time I wish to use a different language.

    Well erm fnord I hate to be the one to tell you this but that is how the Internet and web browsers work. You really think you can type in Chinese using your browser set to American English? Please, PLEASE get a clue. Even a basic one.

    You don't have to do this with VeriSign's ML testbed

    Wrong, wrong. You have to do exactly the same thing with the NSI testbed. Again, get a clue before you write, eh?

    Tens of thousands? In your dreams.

    First it is widely reported that NSI have registered over 900,000 IDNs -- and that data is a few months old. Second, XTNS exceeded 10,000 names on day-one of release yesterday from what I hear. So again, get a clue before you write.

    Who's we? XTNS appears to be a one-person

    What?! You are completely mad. Appears to "who" exactly? Steve Chadima who was writing out of spite and envy at the launch of XTNS by his ex-CTO? Didnt you read the many tens of corrections to Chadima's absurd statement? Good luck to you trying to get people to believe a multimillion $ enterprise like XTNS is just one person. lol

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains Wi by Anonymous
    Re: XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains Wi
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Wednesday September 26 2001, @09:11AM (#2538)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    > Well erm fnord I hate to be the one to tell you this but that is how the Internet
    > and web browsers work. You really think you can type in Chinese using your
    > browser set to American English? Please, PLEASE get a clue. Even a basic one.

    No, actually, standards-compliant browsers represent characters by use of Unicode, which allows characters from multiple languages to coexist. If the standards are followed properly (and a browser is used that supports them, which the latest generation of browsers is getting closer to than earlier ones), there is no need to manually select different character sets when browsing websites in different languages.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: XTNS Launches Multilingual Internet Domains Wi
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday September 27 2001, @03:24AM (#2569)
    User #2810 Info
    MikeR writes:
    You flame people for being anon. They log in and your flame them for logging in. I and others will no doubt not log-in in future given your attitude and behavior on this board.
    I do wish that you and sock puppets of your ilk (or is that silk?) wouldn't, but I know that is unlikely. Flames? Those aren't flames, you should get out more. Just trying to spark a clue that spreading vaporware in such a confined space is not a Good Thing.
    Well erm fnord I hate to be the one to tell you this but that is how the Internet and web browsers work. Please, PLEASE get a clue. Even a basic one.
    See Dan's and various anonymous non-flackperson(s) comments. Character settings for a GUI OS, an application run on that OS, a character entry field of that application, and internet protocols are all decidedly not the same thing. This may give you/XTNS a basic clue as to which part of your code is broken.
    XTNS exceeded 10,000 names on day-one of release yesterday from what I hear. So again, get a clue before you write.
    You really do think I'm clueless don't you? You expect me to believe that XTNS has an opening day (not their first one, is that like a third annual going out of business sale?) with registration numbers that rival that for any and all new ICANN TLDs, newly repurposed or redelegated ccTLDs, new.net (which received much wider initial coverage), or any other roll-out of "domains". I don't think anyone is that clueless. They're also not clueless enough to fall for these multiple posts from untraceable sources about things they have heard from undisclosed sources. That was used in their previous incarnation and it all turned out to be bogus.
    What?! You are completely mad. Appears to "who" exactly? Steve Chadima who was writing out of spite and envy at the launch of XTNS by his ex-CTO? Didnt you read the many tens of corrections to Chadima's absurd statement?
    I'm not completely mad, just a little angry that such scams don't impode more quickly due to their own internal inconsistencies. Yes I read all those tens of posts, will you use them as evidence for a repetitive stress injury claim? So the rumor is true that Tim Langdell used to work for new.net? Hmmm, I can see how Mr. Langdell might not be a good fit.

    I must admit to being impressed with those new.net individuals whom I've noticed online in various ways. Steve Chadima did well in the public portion of ICANN's Stockholm meeting and here, Andy Duff's diary from Montevideo was as enlightening as anything to have emanated from the ICANN black hole, Leonard Amabile gives clear and concise explanations on new.net's message board and elsewhere (dealing with the unfair claim that their plugin is spyware, and I say that as one who first made that claim), and I assume Patrick Greenwell is the individual who replaced Mr. Langdell, Patrick's occasional posts to the DNSO GA list and the now defunct NSI domain-policy list were always spot on. These individuals seem to be more professional, technically clued, articulate, open, and witty, than whomever works for XTNS (or ICANN for that matter). I don't own any new.net names and short of some new wrinkle I don't see them breaking into the big time, which is too bad. ICANN needs to be made (I almost said kept) honest. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com