ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Did Jeff Davies find a legal loophole? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 143 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Did Jeff Davies find a legal loophole?
    by Anonymous on Tuesday December 24 2002, @12:52PM (#10694)
    I tend to believe Davies. If one goes to afilias.info and do a whois lookup on florida.info, one sees that he is in fact listed as the registrant without any tm information present.

    --Anion
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Did Jeff Davies find a legal loophole?
    by Anonymous on Tuesday December 24 2002, @10:46PM (#10702)
    So what, didn't Afilias challenge without any trademarks? Where is that in the ICANN agreement cited or is that after the fact as well?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Did Jeff Davies find a legal @##hole?
    by Anonymous on Wednesday December 25 2002, @07:27PM (#10716)
    Another @filiasgate must be discouraged from occurring in the future.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Did Jeff Davies find a legal loophole?
    by Anonymous on Sunday December 29 2002, @06:45PM (#10765)
    A little sworn testimony on the stand by ranking govt. officials could pay handsome dividends. Even if, as expected, they endorse trademark protection, they can't endorse slipshod business practices if any were brought to light... and they wouldn't want to be portrayed as ineffective if they took no action in their own fief. Raises too many questions. Don't neglect that FOI request.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    The Sunrise Events - from INSIDE Afilias
    by Anonymous on Saturday January 04 2003, @07:13AM (#10858)


    I received this e-mail from a member of the Afilias team who had become concerned at the way .info was being run and what the public did not know. It is a very reliable source which I can entirely corroborate, but equally as an Afilias insider this person needs protection of their privacy. I'm posting it verbatim (the authority for the comments is the person who made them, and not me). I have good reason to trust this person, and they know in detail the planning and events leading up to the Afilias Sunrise:


    The e-mail:


    "Very privately, you should know that Moshe Fogel acted as interim CEO during the set up of Afilias. He acted in that capacity until an outside
    CEO was hired. However, the new CEO did not work out and Hal volunteered to take his place *temporarily* : Moshe sat in on Policy discussions, it was expected that he would convey the rules for Sunrise to Liberty and that Liberty would put in the necessary sanity checks to have minimized the
    incidence of fraudulent Sunrise registrations. I believe you will find that Moshe made questionable registrations during Sunrise, that his company
    made many, and the other Afilias Accredited Registrar in Israel made still more. Do keep your source to yourself, please."


    Why were "sanity" checks (to prevent obviously ineligible Sunrise applications) not implemented? Did companies associated with Afilias benefit as a result of this failure to communicate adequate safeguards?


    I'm not aware of questionable registrations made for himself by Moshe Fogel in the Sunrise period, although I have drawn attention to ineligible applications (with 43 identical fake TMs) made by Galcomm in the Sunrise.


    I'm not clear which other Israel registrar is being alluded to.


    What I find concerning is that Afilias appear to have been aware of the need for sanity checks to root out clearly ineligible applications, but it appears that these sanity checks were never put in place.


    I'm also left wondering why the person who as going to be CEO of Afilias quit suddenly, almost as soon as he'd arrived...


    Would YOU have wanted to be CEO of a company operating in the way Afilias have operated?




    Richard Henderson


    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com