Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Did Jeff Davies find a legal loophole? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 143 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    "Some individuals misused Sunrise to abuse the pro
    by Anonymous on Wednesday January 01 2003, @09:29PM (#10812)

    Hal Lubsen, Afilias CEO, said, "It is unfortunate that some individuals have misused the Sunrise period in an attempt to abuse the process."

    How is that remark compatible with the fact that DomainBank (which Hal has run for years) was submitting 93 fake Sunrise domains for Lorenz, with "None" in place of proper data, in all four Trademark fields where data was mandatory.

    The Registry-Registrar Agreement clearly states that names should not be submitted without eligible data in the four TM fields: Name. Number. Country. Date.

    In the case of these 93 applications (which DomainBank charged IRO $15000 to sponsor), they each said:

    Name: None
    Number: None
    Country: None
    Date: None

    In other words, DomainBank (Hal Lubsen long-term CEO) knowingly broke the Agreement rules, and deceived Lorenz by charging him for a product which they knew they were not allowed to supply.

    And then Afilias (Hal Lubsen CEO), flying in the face of their own Registry Rules, granted the registrations in breach of the process.

    When Lubsen said, "It is unfortunate that some individuals have misused the Sunrise period in an attempt to abuse the process" was he talking about Afilias and DomainBank?

    This seems staggering in its hypocrisy.

    This abuse of process by DomainBank and Afilias was then compounded by their refusal to undo this abuse on the request of Lorenz, who had been told the 93 registrations were ineligible, that he had been sold a worthless non-product, and that honest Landrushers would lose out as a result. He requested Afilias and DomainBank over 20 times (I have the e-mails) that they cancel and delete the registrations before the Landrush.

    This request was declined. Afilias and DomainBank kept their share of the money instead.

    Afilias spin flew in the face of the fact that Afilias had set up a flawed process, they had then ignored that process when it suited them, and Directors had been associated with the abuse of that process (as I've demonstrated elsewhere in this thread).

    Bottom line is that honest consumers from all over the world lost the money they had paid for a reasonable assumption that Afilias were operating a fair and honest system based on reliable business Agreements which were being upheld, enforced and protected.

    Yeah Hal, "Some people misused the Sunrise period in an attempt to abuse the process."

    Richard Henderson

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com