ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Did Jeff Davies find a legal loophole? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 143 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Why didn't they adopt the Domebase Solution?
    by Anonymous on Saturday January 04 2003, @03:15PM (#10874)


    Why didn't they just delete the clearly ineligible names (which broke the rules) and make them available to Landrush customers?


    Why didn't they adopt the Domebase Solution, whereby the Landrush would go ahead for ALL names (including the Sunrise ones) and then allow Sunrise registrants to keep the names UNLESS they were subsequently challenged successfully, in which case the Landrush 1 customers would get the names.


    That way, genuine Sunrise customers and genuine Landrush customers would have been treated fairly, Afilias would have protected the REAL integrity of their process, and they would have done something to salvage their reputation.


    I wrote to Heather Carle, Afilias Board, and ICANN Board repeatedly in the second half of August, asking them why they would not adopt the Domebase Solution. It was so obvious, and so widely supported by people from countries all over the world, as a just and fair solution which would benefit everyone.


    This is a copy of one of those letters, from 24th Aug 2001:


    "Open letter to Heather Carle, Hal Lubsen and Roland laPlante
    cc'd to Vint Cerf, Dan Halloran, and Stuart Lynn
    *************************


    Dear Heather


    If you go to www.theinternetchallenge.com you will now find 1000 .info (later over 10,000)
    Sunrise names.


    As a matter of justice, I am asking you delete even just 500 of them, to re-introduce into the Landrush phase at least some of the generics which were always going to be pre-registered for.


    As you know, many millions of dollars have been paid by people just to have a chance of winning these in your own randomised selection procedure.


    I have some individuals working closely with me, and we hope to have 2000 names on this site towards the end of next week.


    Even a dummy can see that over half of these names could be deleted tomorrow without any possible challenge, because they are visibly ineligible.


    I am now in a position to:


    Name the top 20 multiple applicants
    Name a registrar who has confessed in writing to having faked the Trademarks (of ALL his registrations)
    Name members of your own board whose companies have made fraudulent sunrise claims (in their own personal names)
    Present written confirmation that Afilias has refused to delete names where fraudulent claimants have asked them deleted


    IN CONTRAST:


    You are able to implement the solution widely known as Domebase, otherwise presented to you as "The Simple Solution" which would:


    Satisfy your Trademark applicants
    Satisfy your Landrush applicants
    Facilitate the pursuit of false claimants (since Landrush winners would do this with zeal and, though unfair, in most cases would pay the challenge fees because they would want their winning name badly enough)


    I am asking you in this open letter to explain again why you will not delete, why you will not allow all names into Landrush, and why you allow
    registrars to continue registering, who have plainly broken the rules, including members of your own board.


    I ask you, not in hostility, but because it's right and you know it is.


    With kind regards,


    Richard Henderson


    Berkhamsted Castle
    Berkhamsted
    Herts
    England
    HP4 1LJ


    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com