ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Did Jeff Davies find a legal loophole? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 143 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Truth, lies and registry/registrar responsibil
    by Anonymous on Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:44AM (#10794)

    Take the staggering case of Speednames, represented at the time on the Afilias Board of Directors by Mickey Beyer:


    They were responsible for the biggest Sunrise scam of them all. They charged IRO $500,000 to support the applications of Plankenstein : a staggering 4981 separate Trademark claims for 4981 domains, and as in the cases cited higher up this thread it was facially clear that these Trademarks were preposterous. They were nearly all dated with the year 1899.


    For a company represented on the Afilias Board, and therefore with a particular obligation to uphold the process so that ALL customers were treated fairly, to take the money for a deal which so obviously needed caution and rejection, seems wholly unacceptable.


    The process which should have been used to protect the general public and consumers worldwide was being systematically abused by people INSIDE that process.


    I exchanged very honest, open correspondence with Speednames after this all came to light. They admitted the names should have been rejected and deleted by Afilias.


    Once the scam became known to the public, they ASKED AFILIAS to immediately delete the names, in advance of the Landrush. AFILIAS REFUSED.


    Even though it was now public knowledge that the Agreement had been clearly abused in this, the most obvious case of abuse (and even Plankenstein went public to the press and admitted they were fakes)... nevertheless, Afilias refused to put these names back in the pot for the Landrush pre-registrants. Afilias UPHELD the abuse of their process, rather than protect the consumer.


    4981 fake Trademarks, submitted by a company on the Afilias Board, for half a million dollars profit, in total abuse of the Process supposed to protect people.


    Afilias, their Board, some of their own registrar companies, were part and parcel of an abuse of the Agreements, a failure (or refusal) to implement the process, and the consumer clearly lost out as a result of this abuse of process, and failure to uphold the process.




    Richard Henderson

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Truth, lies and registry/registrar responsibil by Anonymous


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com