| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Talk about Bad Faith...
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 14 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Mueller says, "The Respondent is a servicer and systems integrator of Geac products, and as such has a legitimate interest in the use of the Geac name."
You say, "what [if] the domain name at issue was cocacola.net, and it pointed to ... a Coke distributor."
I'm not a lawyer, but logic tells me that if the Coke distributor is licensed to use the cocacola trademark etc., it has a legitimate interest in using the domain name.
So what's your point besides being adolescently contrary? Is that why you remain "anonymous"?
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
 |
Thanks for the Tip,
I went to sign up yesterday and was able to pay for lunch today, and it looks like it will pay for lunch every day for the rest of this year. It was easy to sign up and I was able to get some feeds/pay-per-clicks that I was searching for all year. No pre-approvals, easy monitoring of your cash flow. Pay Per-Clicks-Rock.......
http://www.searchfeed.com/rd/AffiliateInfo.jsp?p=2283
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|