ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of interest | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday May 20 2002, @04:31PM (#6458)
    User #2810 Info
    And let us not forget that the .org RFP specifies that in the case of, for example, us.org:
    All two-character labels shall be initially reserved. The reservation of a two-character label string shall be released to the extent that the Registry Operator reaches agreement with the government and country-code manager, or the ISO 3166 maintenance agency, whichever appropriate.The Registry Operator may also propose release of these reservations based on its implementation of measures to avoid confusion with the corresponding country codes.
    I am unclear what this would mean for sites like us.org, which presenty resolves to here, but wonder if Dr. Blokzijl took part in any discussions or voting on this restritive retrofitting, given that us.com, which redirects to CentralNic, is not subject to the same restriction. Apparently, the .org draft was due to be finalized today. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by Anonymous on Tuesday May 21 2002, @12:21PM (#6464)
    This type of discussions do not put the substance of his comments and the following board decision away. The simple fact that operating 10-12 .org-roots around the globe is a substantial more complex task than the same amount in one single country (e.g. all under 1 legal jurisdiction) is not going away with a termination of Blokzijls board membership. Any reconvened ICANN BoD would revote again along the same line and become neutral against the nature of the organisation running the registry.

    BTW Blokzijl is also on the advisory board of Nominet, the non-profit .UK-registry, operating also at the 3 million names scale. From the ICANN-board members he is the one with the best view and experience of running such an operation at that scale.

    Therefore, statements of Blokzijl on this subject are convincing to the other less-knowledgeable board members.
    It is extremely clear for me why Milton Mueller has picked him for a defamation run, stating that he considered Blokzijls remarks as the one that flipped the vote. However there is no evidence that other directors where planning to vote against the "neutral decision". And as Milton was not in Accra, he is not able to argue from facial expressions of board members that Blokzijl was busy in an act of convincing other board members to take his side.
    Interestingly however that Blokzijl's vote was cast as the last one, after Wilson and Auerbach voted for neutral over the telephone.

    I am quite curious what happens when an for-profit registry wins the bidding contest for .org. I think they will not the receive the $5,000,000 bonus from Verisign, thus the "neutral" decision of the board still allows a non-profit with the 5 million endowment, while a for profit has to earn this money.

    BTW.
    If you want to hide a Conflict of Interest, you do not invite your wife to an ICANN meeting, registering as a NeuLevel-employee.

    The CoI is only demonstrated if both were aware that NeuLevel was preparing to bid for ".org". An allegation (4 persons working on it) stated by Milton Mueller, that I have to believe on his blue eyes, smelling like hear say.

    Secondly, it is also interesting to see that Karl Auerbach dared to vote on this issue, as he is greatly supported and fired in his quest to dumb down ICANN by the Alternative Root community, a set of for-profit operators that would be excluded from the initial non-profit conditions, but is now also allowed to bid for the .org registry.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com