ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of interest | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday May 20 2002, @12:05AM (#6450)
    User #2810 Info
    1

    Read the rest of this comment...

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by Anonymous on Monday May 20 2002, @02:37AM (#6451)
    Now we find Alejandro Pisanty is also the scumbag.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Rob Blokzijl transcript
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday May 20 2002, @06:58AM (#6453)
    User #2810 Info
    Kent Crispin has given the entire text of Blokzijl's .org comments here. I reproduce it below, for easier reading I've removed the ALLCAPS found in the original and Kent Crispin's copy.

    ----
    Robert Blokzijl: Yeah, I want not so much to comment on the proposed text.

    I want to make clear that the Board and Staff understand the fact that this is different from creating a new top-level domain.

    So we don't have much freedom.

    I'm talking from a technical point of view.

    Whoever is going to run dot org in the near future inherits an existing user base of about 3 million people and organizations, some of them individual persons, some of them large organizations that are really dependent upon the proper operation of dot org. Just To name one, the International Red Cross today could not do its work without the registry dot org.
    ...
    Robert Blokzijl: Icann, maybe.

    There is always icann.nl.

    Which is reserved for Icann, by the way.

    So there are not many organizations that have a demonstrated experience in running a registry with 3 million registered names.

    A registry which has about 10, 12 servers scattered around the world on crucial spots of the internet.

    This is a little bit more than running a country code top-level domain, for instance.
    ....
    Robert Blokzijl: A word from the past.

    Dot org was created at the same time as dot com.

    Dot com was for commercial entities and dot org for noncommercial organizations, not-for-profit organizations.

    And we should have learned from the fact that in an internet space that was incredibly more simple ten years ago than it is today, even then it was not possible to draw a clear line.

    And the current state of affairs is that there are about close to 30 million registrations in the dot com and about 3 million under dot org.

    Under Dot com you will find, i'm sure, if you do an analysis, a lot more commercial activities than under dot org, but you will find non-profits under dot com and you will find profits under dot org.

    The second point is i think in any individual country in the world, it is very difficult to give a proper definition of what is a not-for-profit organization.

    So doing this on the international level, it's an impossible task.

    So less rules are better than more rules, i would say.
    ....
    Robert Blokzijl: Yeah, I understand the concerns. But, again, look at the history.

    There are about 30 million dot com names and about 3 million dot orgs.

    So the vast majority of the commercial world is not interested in protecting their name under dot org. So other people can use names which otherwise might be contested.

    This is how I interpret the vast difference in numbers of registrations.
    ....
    Robert Blokzijl: I would leave it open.
    ....
    Robert Blokzijl: Yeah. I am more interested in good services.
    ----

    And that's it. Some found the last minute change to the DNSO's recommendations surprising, Rob Blokzijl's sudden display of verbosity is no less surprising, particularily as it doesn't seem to be very accurate. Jefsey Morphin has since pointed out some of the factual errors in Blokzijl's history lesson. Also, aso.icann.org was down earlier so I didn't then mention that, while Rob Blokzijl's term as an ICANN Director chosen by the Address Supporting Organization runs out on September 30, 2002, he's been nominated for re-election. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday May 23 2002, @03:43AM (#6480)
    User #2810 Info
    Rumor has it, 80 more layoffs at NeuStar. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com