ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of interest | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday May 20 2002, @12:05AM (#6450)
    User #2810 Info
    ICANN's long time (and now paid) apologist Kent Crispin's argument that Blokzijl was acting simply as a responsible director is at odds with the known facts.

    First, at Stockholm in June 2001, the only question was:

    (a) whether to designate an existing non-profit entity to succeed VeriSign as responsible for operation of the .org TLD, or to create a new non-profit entity;
    There seem to have been no worries at that time that a non-profit would be able to handle .org. Note also that the EU has specified that the .eu registry (which could conceivably rival .org in size) be run by a non-profit. Specifying a non-profit for .org explicitly left NeuLevel unable to apply. Blokzijl's lengthy comments (and Crispin fails to mention that Blokzijl seconded the motion and also voted in favor) went a long way to ensuring that the door was opened so that NeuLevel, his spouse's employer, would have an opportunity to bid on .org if they so wished. No amount of prevarication can change that fact.

    Second, having watched most ICANN public meetings, I don't recall Blokzijl as being particularily wordy in other meetings. In fact, in the earlier part of the Accra meeting he seemed most concerned about rushing things through (including calling the question on the @large) as he said he had a plane to catch. Later, dealing with .org, he seemed to have lots of time.

    So, using the scribe's notes of the various meetings, I went back and looked at how often Rob Blokzijl spoke. Admittedly the Berkman scribe's notes are not as accurate or complete as the near-verbatim Accra transcripts, but having watched most of these meetings in real time while also following the scribe's notes, I have found them to be largely accurate and complete about which Board member is speaking. Here is what I found:

    November 15, 2001 Marina del Rey: The Security Meeting. 7 comments.
    September 10, 2001 Montevideo: 2 comments.
    June 4, 2001 Stockholm: 4 comments.
    March 13, 2001 Melbourne: 8 comments.
    November 16, 2000 Marina del Rey: Recused on new TLDs, 1 other comment.
    July 17, 2000 Yokohama: Arrived late, 0 comments.
    March 10, 2000 Cairo: 3 comments.
    November 4, 1999 Los Angeles: (Assumed office) 1 comment.

    Some of these comments were no more than a single word. Others were no more than a sentence. Certainly he doesn't seem to have at any other time gone on at such length about a topic. There also don't seem to be many topics that cause him to speak. About half of his other comments spanning several meetings are on two topics. One is the At Large (he wants them to go away), and the other is whether country code names should be reserved in .info. Interestingly, he recused himself at MdR2k as he was on the advisory Board of CentralNic. Centralnic sells 3LD's for £65.00 in such domains as *.us.com, *.cn.com, et cetera. Other than at MdR2k he has been talkative about whether to allow, for example: us.info or cn.info.

    It is impossible to measure how often, and about what, he might have spoken during the so-called Special Meetings of the Board, that is, meetings by telephone. I also took a look at those where available. These woefully inadequate minutes very rarely mention who voted on resolutions, though presumably if Blokzijl had ever recused himself it would/should have been recorded. There is no such record. As he is listed as not taking part in some of those meetings, we can assume he didn't speak then. His attendance record:

    13 May 2002 Present
    22 April 2002 Present
    12 February 2002 Present
    21 January 2002 Present
    14 December 2001 Present
    31 July 2001 Absent
    7 May 2001 Absent
    2 April 2001 Absent
    22 January 2001 Absent
    13 December 2000 Present
    31 October 2000 Absent
    17 October 2000 Present
    25 September 2000 Present
    30 August 2000 Present
    6 June 2000 Present
    4 May 2000 Present
    6 April 2000 Present
    10 February 2000 Present (partial)
    12 January 2000 Present
    9 December 1999 Present

    This is less the picture of a Board member simply acting responsibly, and more of one who talked at greater length about the .org non-profit issue than he has on any other, and short of an actual wordcount by rewatching the archives, from memory it rivals his entire prior public output on all issues over the past two and a half years. That speaks volumes about where his priorities lie as a Board member. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday May 20 2002, @04:31PM (#6458)
    User #2810 Info
    And let us not forget that the .org RFP specifies that in the case of, for example, us.org:
    All two-character labels shall be initially reserved. The reservation of a two-character label string shall be released to the extent that the Registry Operator reaches agreement with the government and country-code manager, or the ISO 3166 maintenance agency, whichever appropriate.The Registry Operator may also propose release of these reservations based on its implementation of measures to avoid confusion with the corresponding country codes.
    I am unclear what this would mean for sites like us.org, which presenty resolves to here, but wonder if Dr. Blokzijl took part in any discussions or voting on this restritive retrofitting, given that us.com, which redirects to CentralNic, is not subject to the same restriction. Apparently, the .org draft was due to be finalized today. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Update on Blokzijl's possible conflict of inte
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday May 21 2002, @08:00PM (#6467)
    User #2810 Info
    This is fairly easily put to bed. Let's see if NeuLevel bids for .org. Let's see if someone with whom Karl Auerbach has a financial interest (that interest, as defined by ICANN, that snared the Blokzijls) bids for .org. Then we can talk. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com