| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Senator Burns Queries Legality of ICANN-DoC Relationship
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 7 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I fully support the Senator's Action And Believe That Competion Is The Key To Any Successful Business. I Further Applaud New.Net Work To Add New Extensions To Protect Our Children!
With .XXX Domain Names - ISP's Will Have The Ability To Filter Adult Material! And NOT Allow A Child Looking Up www.WhiteHouse.com Access To A Porn Site!
ICANN - LEAD OR GET OUT OF THE WAY!
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
You may want to look at this: ".xxx Considered Dangerous?".
Also, can someone explain to me by what method (and under whose law?) one would force existing pornmeisters in .com and/or various ccTLDs to move to .xxx or whatever? Seems like a pipe dream to me.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | | 2 replies beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
