ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    AP Reports It's Still King .com | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 14 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: AP Reports It's Still King .com
    by challenge on Wednesday September 19 2001, @07:55AM (#2382)
    User #3020 Info
    Sounds like you're finding excuses for ICANN, the only reason why those other ones are slipping through quietly, is a testament to their true worth and not to the fact that ICANN did a better job there.

    Having said that, I was mostly referring to the fact that extensions will live or die by their popular relevance. Outside of ".name" and ".info", none of the remaining new-extensions will amount to much.

    They will add to the confusion and exasperate the biggest ailment afflicting the Internet, and that is "data overload".. Users at large are being turned away by the printed-flyer mentality that's ruling the web. Fifteen different extensions will NOT make for a better user experience.

    I think it is reasonable to expect that:
    Someone looking for a business, would use .com
    A non-profit-organization or institution, .org
    A government site, .gov
    A person, .name
    General Information, .info

    Everything else flows through search engines.

    Outside of those 5, it would be a real stretch to expect any significant traffic and that is why I believe that "niche extensions" will go nowhere..

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: AP Reports It's Still King .com by challenge
    Re: AP Reports It's Still King .com
    by wesmills on Thursday September 20 2001, @02:24AM (#2414)
    User #3060 Info
    What gets me is, why do a lot of people think that "naturally" those looking for a personal site domain will flock to .name? To me, the .name scheme is very awkward, resulting in addresses like wes.mills.name, or www.wes.mills.name. To have an e-mail address that fits with the scheme (i.e. wes@mills.name), I have to buy e-mail services from a limited number of providers, authorized by the registrar.

    This makes no sense to me. It also presupposes that people want "vanity" domains with their name in them. My website, e-mail, etc, has been wyvern.org for almost 5 years now, which bears no resemblance to my name, even though I could have had wesmills.* (and did own the dot-com at one time). I just don't see where .name will be all that popular, considering the e-mail restrictions and the strange way (yes, it makes sense on a purely logical level, but not when held up against other domains .. too many dots for one thing) domains will be laid out.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com