ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Lynn responds to new sTLD comments | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 38 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Lynn's comment below is meaningless and moved by c
    by Anonymous on Saturday December 14 2002, @02:24AM (#10546)
    LYNN SAID:

    "In many conversations I have had on this subject, my own sampling indicates that there are as many, if not more, individuals who favor no more TLDs as there are those who advocate moving forward."
    --------------------------

    Who cares that there are those who do not favor the expansion of namespace? Their motive is clearly connected to an interest in speculating in the current namespace; additional extensions would dillute their holdings.

    Who else would fear namespace expansion? Oh, perhaps a businessman who doesn't want the branding power of a generic SLD to be given to other people. So is it ICANN's mission to serve the interest of those who want to restrict competition? Is this what Stuart Lynn is defending?

    A legitimate developer and businessman who is not hell-bent on eliminating diversity will possess the domains he possesses, will brand it and go on their strength. And if he is not personally interested in new namespace, he has the right to refrain from registering and developing therein. He does NOT have the right, however, to deny new namespace to others.

    So, Mr. Lynn, your position clearly illustrates your continued interest to restrict namespace expansion for illegitimate and corrupt reasons. You have come so close to admitting that you support those who, in corrupt self-interest, care to diminish competition. Can't you now just come out and state it forthright? It would make things so much easier.

    Admit that, in particular, you don't want diversity and competition at the registry level because Verisign, and Versign through Afilias, line your coffers. This is not in dispute.

    Don't play us for fools. I will personally and continually shine the light on your corruption, bias and self-interest. You do not have the moral right on your side. The history of an open market system counters your arguments for market restrictiveness

    And you simply don't have to right to set policy, regardless of your personal values. You were not given the authority.

    I wish you would just take the short cut to hell, Mr. Lynn. The road you're currently on is just too damned slow.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    P.S. from original poster:
    by Anonymous on Saturday December 14 2002, @02:43AM (#10547)
    Flame me for being "anonymous" if you want. Let's just say that I don't trust you enough to give you disclosure; you clearly abuse your position and power. Focus not on my identity, but on the arguments I lay at your fetid feet.





    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Lynn's comment below is meaningless and moved
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Saturday December 14 2002, @04:55AM (#10549)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    Who cares that there are those who do not favor the expansion of namespace? Their motive is clearly connected to an interest in speculating in the current namespace; additional extensions would dillute their holdings.

    True... but it's likely that a large part of the constituency for adding new TLDs has similarly self-serving motives -- this includes would-be operators of new TLD registries, as well as speculators who missed the boat on good names in currently-existent TLDs so wish the addition of new ones to give them a chance to speculate on them. Once these people do manage to grab a bunch of names in a new TLD, they're likely to change camps to the anti-expansion side to protect their investment by opposing any additional TLDs.

    People who want a namespace that makes logical sense are a weak lobby compared to all the different self-interested groups.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com