| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
M. Stuart Lynn prefers restricted domains
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 68 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
It's not up to ICANN to make that kind of decision. There are companies out there that want to compete. ICANN is not a market guardian, they are a technical coordination body. A body that's clearly overstepping its bounds.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: M. Stuart Lynn prefers restricted domains
by Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical coordination, market guardian, what's the difference. DoC has placed responsibilty with ICANN to coordinate the DNS. ICANN, and many others, seem to think that the best way is to go slow, rather than throw open the system without respect for any law.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
What's the difference? You're either ignorant or you're trolling. I'm going to guess both.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
