| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
M. Stuart Lynn prefers restricted domains
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 68 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Except for the fact that if ICANN makes such a limit, they're restricting what legally should be a free market. That's against the law in the United States, and that's where ICANN is.
Philosophically, you may be right. But it's too late for philosophy. Once ICANN allowed Afilias and Neulevel in to the market, they had to allow more in. If there's a problem, they'd have to remove .info and .biz (and most likely .com as well).
They can't do that.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: New TLDs
by Anonymous
|
|
|
| 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
