| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
ICANN's Creation of more sponsored TLDs
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 27 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
"I disagree that the new TLDs are "succeeding or failing on their own merits". To the contrary, ICANN has imposed an intensive system of restrictive regulation on new TLDs."
This is absolutely correct....of course, what we hear is that these restrictions are by way of "mutual contract agreement". My guess is that, underneath it all, the delay in the .PRO launch has had something to do with "mutual agreement" where, in absence of, illustrates the very nature of the penalty....just my guess.
Ray
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
 |
Have any of those reports been made publicly viewable yet? The agreements provided timetables where various reports were to be kept confidential for varying lengths of time, after which they would be publicly available. By now, quite a few of the reports should be past their period of confidentiality, so where can we see them?
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|