ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN General Counsel's Opinion vs. Reality | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 26 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN General Counsel's Opinion vs. Reality
    by Anonymous on Tuesday December 03 2002, @12:29PM (#10390)
    The only "quick look" approval that ICANN needs now is to stop the madness of restricting the market to competition.

    Approve the pending applications NOW!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN General Counsel's Opinion vs. Reality
    by Anonymous on Tuesday December 03 2002, @12:55PM (#10391)
    It is not ICANN's job to:

  • Regulate the business processes or offerings of a new DNS TLD beyond that needed to ensure that Internet communications protocols are observed.

  • Protect the consumers of DNS products (except those who have been trapped into the legacy TLDs such as .com, .net, and .org.) ICANN ought to require that customers have available to them sufficient information to know the risks they take by doing business with a provider of DNS products.


  • Normal economic forces, competition, and laws concerning unfair trade practices should be allowed to operate and not be usurped or replaced by ICANN regulation.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN General Counsel's Opinion vs. Reality
    by Anonymous on Tuesday December 03 2002, @01:28PM (#10395)
    The last chapter of the .info abomination hasn't been written yet.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Much ado about nothing
    by Anonymous on Tuesday December 03 2002, @07:33PM (#10398)
    .Pro's policies make no difference to anyone. No one (save the registry) actually uses this tld and its improbable that anyone ever will. ICANNwatchers should "let sleeping dogs lie" and leave this one alone .

    --Anion
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN General Counsel's Opinion vs. Reality
    by Anonymous on Wednesday December 04 2002, @06:50AM (#10416)
    Mr. Berryhill seems to have gotten this one wrong. .info and .biz didn't offer "defensive registrations," did they? Isn't it only .name that's used "defensive registrations"? Have there been any lawsuits over the .name landrush?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • Re: Wrong by Anonymous Wednesday December 04 2002, @12:20PM
    Not Turned Down
    by Anonymous on Wednesday December 04 2002, @05:37PM (#10428)
    As requested, I direct your attention to the boilerplate response given at the beginning of every request for reconsideration due to the TLD selection process. Specifically:


    "Second, it should be clear that no applications were rejected; the object was not to pick winners and losers, but to select a limited number of appropriate proposals for a proof of concept. All of the proposals not selected remain pending, and those submitting them will certainly have the option to have them considered if and when additional TLD selections are made."


    A lie, of course, since unsponsored applications are most certainly not being given the option to have them considered.

    But, as you asked for proof of my claim, I am only too happy to provide it.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com