| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Boardsquatting: the sequel?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 5 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
No, I don't think you will.
I think you will see the transition board, probably without Karl as I think he'll resign in protest, until the nominating committee is in place.
You will then see the nominating committee nominate almost all of the existing board members (without the elected members), under the reasoning that they've done a good job to date, and there is no reason to let them go now and lose their experience.
Realise, please, that I do not agree with this logic, but it is how I expect ICANN to proceed.
++Peter
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: Boardsquatting: the sequel?
by PeterBarron
|
|
|
| 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
