ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Lauren Weinstein on the ALSC | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Lauren Weinstein on the ALSC
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday September 10 2001, @03:57PM (#2332)
    User #2810 Info
    I think I must have missed something. That would specifically include the rabble now speculating and cybersquatting (they are two different things) and pr0n site operators (they're the only ones making money, d'ya think they could run a campaign?) and those interests that already control the Board. That and a few hapless end-users who want a name they can be known or found by, and have rare good luck (to get by those with enough skill or money to trick or bribe their way to the front of what used to be a first come, first served line), where they then face an ever-increasing gauntlet of ICANN border guards asking (sorry, demanding) if their papers are all in order. Charming. I'm sure end users interests will be better served. Actually, that was said sardonically but it might even be true.

    My take on the number breakdown is not to sweat the small stuff. The Board is a choke point, a locus of control, for the power and money interests. It has been since the beginning. If we can get an Andy or Karl on there, fine, but it will never, ever, amount to having enough seats for systemic change even if there was a 2/3 @Large. But the other side doesn't play fair if you haven't noticed. If there ever was a chance for sufficient seats to make a difference the puppet masters would have the table booby-trapped. It probably already is just in case. This is a war for the namespace between entrenched interests and the end-user, and most of the latter don't even know it. Democracy is a Good Thing, but the most the current King will ever allow is a Magna Carta that gives a bit of power to a few noblemen to take their turn oppressing the peasants. Hey, call it the new Cerfdom.

    They read Sun Tzu. They've already defined the battlefield. How much well-intentioned time and energy (including some of mine) has gone into being reactive rather than proactive? We've seen over the last few days of ICANN meetings (more openly and consistently than ever) that they operate through the staff's speed, secrecy, and surprise, not the Board. Elections are a Trojan horse. Beware of geeks bearing gifts. Even if we were allowed entrance we'd be told to take it offline.

    Naw, keep it online but keep the numbers small and unpredictable, pick your own choke points, your own battlefields. And if that means a few folks continuing to push for more seats just to keep them busy (and because it was the deal) then fine. Only for identification purposes though, I do admit a 666 Board seems fitting. They've got the Board but we've got the numbers. Route around them.-g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com