ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Invites Comments on its TLD 'Action Plan' | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 59 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN Invites Comments on its TLD 'Action Plan
    by Anonymous on Sunday November 10 2002, @05:03PM (#10059)
    It would be very unfair to require an application fee from those who had applications not selected in 2000.

    But many of those from two years ago had applications that are too broad to fit under Stuart Linns' very limited conception of the Internet under ICANN. Will those people be held in suspense for yet another two years, or more?

    All in all, the lack of imagination contained in Linn's plan is apalling. Stuart Linn's idea of progress and innovation must be so shortsighted that he must still be watching a black and white TV and using a rotary dial telephone.

    Linn's plan slams the brakes on innovation and puts the internet into high speed reverse. Linn's plan reinforces the thinking that brought us all those stupid dot-com ideas that failed over the last two years.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Invites Comments on its TLD 'Action Plan
    by Anonymous on Sunday November 10 2002, @05:51PM (#10061)
    This plan will result in the applicants from 2000 who applied for unsponsored TLDs to sue ICANN.

    I welcome it.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Sponsored only?
    by Anonymous on Sunday November 10 2002, @06:57PM (#10062)

    I notice that only the SPONSORED applicants from Round 1 will be permitted (per Lynn's proposal) to update their applications and rebid in the next round.

    What precisely IS a "sponsored" applicant and an "unsponsored" applicant, respectively? And if implicit in this proposal, a percentage of the original applicants are to be denied access to the rebidding process.....Well, WHY precisely? This seems rather odd and inappropriate.....Certainly not an uncommon feature of ICANN actions and decisions.

    Lynn clearly is trying to limit participation to only insiders. That's how Afilias got in last time. It is blatantly obvious that ICANN is again trying to limit competition.

    Lynn, you bastard, why don't you crawl back into your swamp and drown in your own bile? You know that you are one of the most hated creatures in the Namespace industry. Have you ever fathomed why?







    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Invites Comments on its TLD 'Action Plan
    by Anonymous on Monday November 11 2002, @01:40AM (#10070)
    "Sponsored" means restricted, ala .museum, .coop, .aero. Unsponsored means open season, like .info and .biz. We don't need more open season tlds, we need restricted use tlds.

    Watch for a .news to be introduced.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Invites Comments on its TLD 'Action Plan
    by Anonymous on Monday November 11 2002, @06:06AM (#10076)
    Call it a hunch, but is ICANN feeling the heat from somewhere?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: I've Got An Ear On The Inside ...
    by Anonymous on Monday November 11 2002, @10:15AM (#10084)
    I'm telling you, Afilias is getting one of the three new TLDs, and Ken Stubbs looks like he just did a "got milk" ad.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Some Opening Comments on these NewTLD proposals
    by Anonymous on Monday November 11 2002, @12:05PM (#10090)
    1

    Read the rest of this comment...

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Invites Comments on its TLD 'Action Plan
    by Anonymous on Monday November 11 2002, @03:56PM (#10098)
    Time for ICAAN/Halloran to ante up. Too much time already has elapsed. What's the holdup? -ShamusMandamus
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Invites Comments on its TLD 'Action Plan
    by Anonymous on Monday November 11 2002, @05:24PM (#10105)
    If more TLDs are created without unsponsored and unrestricted competition for Afilias, Neustar and Verisign, ICANN will have, with no technical reason, illegally restricted a marketplace.

    It is not up to Stuart Lynn to decide if there is demand. Even if there is no demand, there are companies that want to compete. If they are denied, especially the ones who have already paid for a fair chance, ICANN will have no legal ground upon which to stand.

    If ICANN is that stupid, I look forward to their demise.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com