ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Greenpeace Wants Its Own Root | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 12 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Authorities bastardized words for one use
    by WIPOorgUK on Friday March 08 2002, @11:56PM (#5190)
    User #3146 Info | http://wipo.org.uk/
    Just posted this on Greenpeace site:

    The authorities have bastardized words for one use - as a fatally flawed trademark system.

    Hello, my name is Garry Anderson. I have been in contact, for quite some time, with US and UK authorities (and lawyers) on these domain and trademark problems.

    Virtually every word is trademarked, be it Alpha to Omega or Aardvark to Zulu, most many times over.

    MOST share the same words or initials with MANY others in a different business and/or country.

    For example, the World Trade Organization (WTO) shares its initials with six trademarks - in the U.S. alone.

    The United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization and the United States Department of Commerce know the answer to exclusively identify ALL trademark domains.

    It would allow ALL to use their trademark, without 'consumer confusion', 'trademark conflict' and 'passing off'.

    Based on all evidence, I believe the authorities are corrupt. If they truly wanted rid of these problems, why do they not use the solution?

    People and small non-trademarked businesses could then use domains without these excuses being used to take away their legal property in UDRP.

    The simple solution was ratified by honest attorneys - including the honourable G. Gervaise Davis III, UN WIPO panellist judge.

    Please visit WIPO.org.uk to see - no connection with United Nations WIPO.org.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Greenpeace hypocrisy
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Saturday March 09 2002, @06:34AM (#5194)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    That statement of theirs is actually hypocritical if you analyze it fully... they oppose corporate ownership of names, but then criticize new.net for "holding hostage" greenpeace.[TLD] in their system because Greenpeace would have to pay them if it wanted to get those names before somebody else, perhaps a critic of Greenpeace, did. It sounds then like they'd like to eliminate all corporate trademarks except for their own... they're not about to let the name "Greenpeace" fall into the public domain and be available for the use of anybody who comes along. If they weren't protective of this name in a corporate manner, they wouldn't care if others could come along and register that name in new.net or any other naming system that comes along.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Greenpeace Wants Its Own Root
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Saturday March 09 2002, @06:41AM (#5195)
    User #2810 Info
    Let's not blow this out of proportion. It was an anonymous posting on a Greenpeace message board. The board carries the prominent statement (twice):
    Comments and articles posted on the Greenpeace Cyberactivist Community are owned by the person who posted them and do not necessarily represent the views of Greenpeace.
    Not unlike the ICANNWatch message board as it happens, so portraying this as an official Greenpeace position is well off the mark.

    Interestingly, David Hernand , CEO of new.net, has responded there to correct the error that new.net names go to the highest bidder (they don't, they have a fixed price), and offers to donate a Greenpeace.* new.net name.

    Nevertheless, while this clearly isn't a Greenpeace position, it may be a hint of things to come. As I said here in response to the Lynn roadmap, ICANN, to the extent that it is making itself a tool of big biz and big governments, is painting a target on itself for those who oppose some actions of big biz and big governments. There will probably come a time when they'll wish they hadn't done that. FWIW, I was one of the first members of Greenpeace. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com