ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Some thoughts on Stuart Lynn's 'Authoritative Root' Discussion Draft | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 6 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Some thoughts on Stuart Lynn's 'Authoritative
    by craig.mctaggart@utor (craig_mctaggart canada com) on Wednesday June 06 2001, @05:42AM (#750)
    User #671 Info | http://www.innovationlaw.org/cm/index.htm
    Rather than being "simply and most profoundly incorrect", Dr. Lynn's statement that "coordination of the assignment function by a single authority is necessary where unique parameter values are technically required" is fundamentally correct.

    Professor Post's comment, as well as many of his published works, do not recognize the inherently *binary* nature of computing and computer networking. Things are either on or off. In or out. 1 or 0. Computers are maddeningly unforgiving of ambiguity and diversity - two of the hallmarks of non-computer languages.

    Arguments which apply in environments of diversity are inapplicable to environments of uniformity. You may wish to use a symbol other than the ampersand in email addresses, but your email won't get far. No one can tell you that you can't do so - you are completely at liberty to do so. This is good news for libertarians. But if you want to be heard via Internet email, you use that darned old constrictive, oppressive ampersand. The text comprising your message can be diverse. The codes in the header can't.

    It is essential in Internet discourse to distinguish between the many layers which comprise networks, and similarly distinguish the kinds of arguments that apply at different layers. Professor Post's arguments relating to language may be appropriate at the content layer, where diversity is the rule, but not at the protocol layer, where uniformity is the rule.

    If you don't believe Dr. Lynn, listen to the series of heavy-duty experts (e.g., John Klensin) who supported the unique root idea (in the abstract, at least) during the open mic segment of the discussion of Dr. Lynn's paper on Sunday June 3 in Stockholm. The majority of speakers supported it, in fact, contrary to the many who apparently disagreed in online comments submitted. I'm serious - listen to the feed.

    Let's try to recognize that if we want one network that works everywhere, we need uniformity at some layers. Other networks, using other roots, are always possible, but by definition have less reach than this amazing network that we all use and love, which Dr. Lynn accurately describes as "the public Internet".

    Craig McTaggart
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com