Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ALSC publishes Final Draft | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 7 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ALSC publishes Final Draft
    by AlanDavidson (adavidson@cdt.org) on Tuesday August 28 2001, @02:10AM (#2043)
    User #3014 Info | www.cdt.org
    It is quite useful that the At-Large Study Committee released its report well in advance of the Montevideo meeting. At first glance, major features of the report include:
    * Creation of an "ALSO" membership organizaton
    * Reduction in number of At-Large directors from 9 to 6
    * Direct elections for At-Large Directors by members
    * Membership limited to domain name holders
    * Membership fee (unspecified amount, no sliding scale proposed)
    * Six geographical regions for ICANN (Asia split)

    Some elements of the report are quite helpful, including the acknowledgement of ICANN's "public interest" role and the need for individual user participation. The comments on creating a more vital membership organization and endorsing democratic elections are also quite good.

    Other parts of the report will trouble some people. Reducing the number of At-Large Directors to 6 from 9, for example, means that Bylaws revisions (which require 2/3 of the Board to approve) could occur without the consent of those Directors. This had previously been viewed as a bedrock guarantee of some importance.

    Limiting membership to domain name holders raises many questions. Who is a domain name holder? (The report defines "individual domain name holders" in such as way that organizations would appear to be able to vote through their designated contact person.) Will companies with many domains be able to cast many votes? Is this a fair structure for representation of the broader public? Note that DNS holders as a group appear to be largely made up of the very organizations and interests already well-represented in the SOs.

    No doubt this is the beginning of a long discussion. The NGO and Academic ICANN Study (http://www.naisproject.org/), of which I am a part, will be releasing its Final Report on Friday. That report will take a slightly different approach. We look forward to comments as well.

    - Alan Davidson
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ALSC publishes Final Draft
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday August 31 2001, @08:41AM (#2083)
    User #2810 Info
    Karl Auerbach has some things to say.

    I fail to see how an @large of 6 will be an improvement on 5. The 5 existing BoD members don't vote as a bloc, how would having one more seat make a difference? Even 9 seats might not make much difference. The entities now (often wrongly) in control of ICANN can and do often vote as a bloc when looking out for their self interests. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ALSC publishes Final Draft
    by rforno (rforno@infowarrior.org) on Tuesday August 28 2001, @03:24AM (#2046)
    User #2832 Info | www.infowarrior.org
    Yet another bureaucracy built to support another bureaucracy. ICANN is going to be successful PRECISELY because it's so convoluted and the only folks that can decipher it are full-time lawyers and DNS analysts. If this was a for-profit, you can bet there'd be DoJ actions for antitrust and/or anticompetitive practices, despite what ICANN's claims are to the contrary, that they exist for the good of the internet community at large.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ALSC publishes Final Draft
    by alan on Tuesday August 28 2001, @08:00PM (#2048)
    User #2877 Info
    Perhaps this is the idea? Further dilute the individual voices by mixing in a bunch of other interests?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com