Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    VeriSign Requests We Stop Using Their Logo | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 5 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: VeriSign Requests We Stop Using Their Logo
    by larry on Wednesday May 23 2001, @06:24AM (#633)
    User #2751 Info
    I don't think it's a trivial issue at all. I think that if you are entitled to use it because of fair use, you should. If not, then you should remove it. I don't imagine there is a newspaper in this country that would have agreed with the position that you've taken. It appears to me that you might be intimidated by the threat of some legal action, or are trying to preserve some kind of access to the Verisign legal counsel. Just my thoughts.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: VeriSign Requests We Stop Using Their Logo
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Wednesday May 23 2001, @08:05AM (#634)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    Well, I could see how you might think that. And, indeed, I do think our use of it was legal or I would never have done it in the first place. But if a nice person calls up and asks nicely, what's the harm in doing a favor to someone about something quite so tangential to our mission? Of course if someone wanted something *substantive* removed, that would be different.

    One of the nice things about having rights is that it includes the right to choose when and whether to exercise them. My vote (which could be overruled by my fellow editors, of course), is to be as nice to everyone as we can be, especially about things that are not core to our mission. While the editors of this web site enjoy the same First Amendment rights as any other news and commentary organization based in the USA, and I for one am fully prepared to assert them if needed, we also enjoy the use of our independent judgment as to what's important and when we can be nicer than legally required. The fact is that our graphics are meant to be colorful and entertaining and easy markers for types of stories but it's the stories that matter...

    The only potential harms I can see here is that this action might (1) encourage other people to complain about our use of images; (2) encourage people to attempt to get us to remove content. The first one doesn't panic me for the reasons given above (anyway, at this moment, I think the only other logo we currently use in any form is a part of ICANN's). In contrast, the second one would be a serious matter, but as I said, I'm prepared to fight about what I think matters.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com