Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Dan Halloran challenged on Registrars and ICANN's responsibilities | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 29 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re Dan Halloran and ICANN
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Sunday May 12 2002, @11:06PM (#6271)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    - ICANN ONLY speak from my own experience and my perusal of clear and evident corporate and trademark ILLEGALITY, BIAS AND UNFAIRNESS in domain name dispute panel decisions. - ICANN are demonstrably not interested in either Consumer rights and fairness; they clearly wish to maintain the Status Quo and do not wish to rock the boat for either Registrars, Big Brother or Big Business. - Well, if they won't take action, WE WILL!! - I say scrap ICANN and appoint a new body fairly and duly elected by the internet community AS A WHOLE. - ADRIAN PAUL MILES ANNO DOMINI 2000 www.ad2000d.com www.aim5.com -
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re Dan Halloran and ICANN by ANNODOMINI2000
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Wednesday May 15 2002, @01:37AM (#6345)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    Loser? Ha ha.... The last laugh is on me!!

    Interesting how abusive posts are always posted ANONYMOUSLY isn't it?

    You're the loser NOT me mate!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Wednesday May 15 2002, @01:41AM (#6346)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/

    I allowed AOL to win the first ERDRP case on technical grounds, ie I need no case under the ERDRP to retain the .NAMES.

    However, if you go to http://www.ad2000d.com/ , you will see there is another - much, much more important arbitration case just about to be decided upon...


    AOL should not win this one; this is a major precedent case for Consumer and Human Rights.

    Check it out for yourself at http://www.aim5.com/

    ...See you all later when I'm rich and famous!!...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Saturday May 18 2002, @10:24AM (#6445)
      User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
      Firstly, I am NOT a cybersquatter; secondly, I am a citizen of England and US Law does not apply here anyway, not that it is relevant anyway!
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Saturday May 18 2002, @10:25AM (#6446)
      User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
      I didn't "violate" anything.

      I did not contest the case as I clearly failed the eligibility requirement tests for the two .NAMES.

      Trademark rights had NOTHING to do with this case.

      Watch the "AIM5.COM" case very closely and weep, loser!
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      Re John Zuccarini
      by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Wednesday May 29 2002, @11:19PM (#6562)
      User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
      John Zuccarini linked famous names to pornographic websites, as do many others.

      I simply link significant names to THEIR OWN websites as a FREE courtesy link... and I also only transfer the domains to the famous person or trademark holder(s) and NO-ONE else...

      There is a big, BIG difference!

      What Zuccarini did (does?) is immoral, abusive and illegal; what I do is moral, useful and most certainly not illegal.

      I am not your average Cybersquatter, because I am not a Cybersquatter... a charitable, flexible, friendly and Consumer-friendly Cyber-sitter in fact.

      Oh, and many of my domain names are available for FREE TRANSFER to the people who might wish to use them.
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
        Re: Re John Zuccarini
        by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Thursday May 30 2002, @10:59AM (#6576)
        User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
        That is where you are wrong, my 'friend' - clearly, you do not know your UDRP from your UPTHETREE!
        [ Reply to This | Parent ]
        Cyber Sitting and Cyber Squatting
        by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday May 31 2002, @02:44AM (#6594)
        User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
        "cyber-sitter and cybersquatter are the same thing"

        No, they're not. They both can involve registering famous or trademarked names, but that is the only thing they have in common. This is not illegal. Domain names are still sold on a first-come, first-serbed basis, and always have been.

        Otherwise, it is like saying a Baby-Sitter is necessarily always a Child-Abductor or a Loan Advisor is always a Loan Shark!
        [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          PS Re Cyber Sitting and Cyber Squatting
          by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday May 31 2002, @02:50AM (#6596)
          User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
          Which would you prefer?

          Getting your own name for $500 with no strings attached, or buying it from a Cyber Squatter for $100,000 with no guarantee they will hono(u)r it?

          I know you will say you'd rather just register it yourself, but you simply can't do this if a Cyber Squatter has already gotten hold of it before you (and they are very quick to do so, particularly with the very controversial pre-registering of lapsed domain names, and also the rip-off Snap Names programme)

          I am simply a Consumer and Corporate-friendly Cyber Sitter, not a Cyber Squatter, which term I loathe. Squatting implies no payment for something that is not yours and domain name registration involves actually paying to purchase something for yourself!

          Think about it.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com