| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
.US Registry Deleting Domain Names Retroactively!!
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 41 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
By what logic do you arrive that no new TLDs are needed? There are companies that want to run them. How do you justify closing the market to those companies? Were ICANN not able to hide behind the US Government, they would have been sued for restraint of trade long ago.
Professor Froomkin, I believe, still thinks that ICANN should be so on the hook, correct?
++Peter
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
 |
I've visited Michael at law.tm, why wouldn't I visit him at froomkin.prof? Your other comments are equally wrong. Some truly cybersquatted names do have value. And cybersquatting, speculation, and defensive registrations all are already dropping even with the limited introduction of new gTLDs and repurposed ccTLDs. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|