| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
.US Registry Deleting Domain Names Retroactively!!
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 41 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
I would not release many "within a short period of time". I'd set up a clear and predictable schedule for new ones coming on stream. Say, one a month for the foreseeable future. People would quickly be trained to expect new TLDs. More importantly the speculative value would drop to near zero, cutting cybersquatting.
I think it's likely that some registry somewhere will fail someday. That's why good data escrow is one of the ICANN rules I support, and why I'm so puzzled it hasn't been put into practice. It seems almost certain to me that were a registry to go under, its client base would be an asset that other registries would want to buy, so the odds are good that clients would not be harmed at all.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | | 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
