| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
.US Registry Deleting Domain Names Retroactively!!
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 41 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Michael,
Truely cybersquatted names are currently of no value, so your argument that adding new TLDs would cut cybersquatting is ridiculous.
You seem to lump speculators in with the bad, showing your bias ... that's okay. However, you can release one new gTLD a month, and I can promise you I'll get defensive registrations in every new TLD, and so will every speculator and trademark holder participating in this forum and every other industry forum. Domains are cheap enough to do just that.
Adding new TLDs for the main purpose of detering speculation and cybersquatting is folly. Only add new TLDs if they are needed, and they are not currently needed. You think anyone is going to visit you at Froomkin.prof? I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
