ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Executive Committee Votes Funds to GAC | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN Executive Committee Votes Funds to GAC
    by hofjes on Wednesday August 14 2002, @11:05AM (#8479)
    User #60 Info
    ICANN loves the GAC. When looking at redelegation reports, the factor most heavily weighed (in fact, almost exclusively weighed) is compliance with GAC Principles. However, the board never adopted the GAC principles. The GAC principles is just a document by an advisory panel to which the ICANN staff always defers.

    The ultimate query relevant to this thread is why ICANN is so deferential to the GAC. What is Paul Twomey’s role? What should the GAC role be? I think it should be merely advisory.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Executive Committee Votes Funds to GAC
    by rhill on Friday August 16 2002, @05:12AM (#8537)
    User #3320 Info | http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/
    The following is posted at:

    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg03427.html

    A number of questions have been asked and comments made regarding the ICANN
    Board's recent decision to fund partly, for a limited period of time, the
    GAC secretariat and chair functions, see

    http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-13aug02.htm

    The following information, which is based on what I know, may answer some of
    the questions that have been raised.

    At the Accra meeting 11-12 March 2002, the Chair of GAC, Paul Twoomey,
    stated:

    "... the Chair advised that he will be resigning effective from the end of
    the Shanghai meeting and the Australian Government will cease providing the
    Secretariat function at the end of the Bucharest meeting."

    The issue of replacing the GAC Secretariat was discussed at the 9-10 April
    GAC meeting in Bruxelles and the 3-4 June GAC meeting in Canberra.

    At both those meetings, some GAC members, and in particular ITU, offered to
    provide some secretariat services as in-kind support for GAC. Specifically,
    ITU offered to provide the basic secretariat support for meetings, at no
    cost to ICANN or to GAC (since the costs are already covered by ITU's
    participation).

    These offers were noted but not discussed. It was noted that a global
    discussion of the nature and role of the GAC secretariat should take place
    in the context of ICANN reform.

    The GAC meeting in Bucharest was essentially focussed on preparing comments
    on the recently-published Blueprint for Reform. At the very end of the
    meeting, at 3am, Paul Twoomey announced that Australia had reversed its
    previous decision to stop funding the Chair and the Secretariat and was
    willing to fund both the Chair and the Secretariat for an interim period.
    As a consequence, the Chair announced that Australia would continue to
    provide the Secretariat.

    I am informed that subsequently the Australian government informed ICANN
    that it would be willing to perform the role of GAC Secretariat, but
    indicated that it would no longer fund that role. I am informed that the
    Australian government subsequently raised with ICANN the issue of finding
    alternative sources of funding.

    As noted in previous E-Mails, the Board made a decision to provide up to
    $75'000 dollars to the Australian goverment, to cover actual costs of chair
    and secretariat services for a limited period of time.

    I am informed that a draft budget for this funding, for the period 1 July to
    15 November, is being prepared by the GAC Secretariat and will be circulated
    to the GAC membership.

    Best,
    Richard
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Something Else Used to Be Here
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Friday August 16 2002, @10:08AM (#8557)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    Consistent with the policies described in our FAQ, I've deleted an annonymous post that was (borderline) libelous. Due to the quirks of our software this results in deleting the two replies.

    Here is the text of the deted posts, with one line removed.

    Conspiracy? (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 14 @ 17:34:18 MDT

    Something is fishy here.


    Paul Twomey is [FIVE WORDS DELETED HERE -MF] He is partners with Ira Magaziner who is responsible for the white paper giving rise to ICANN (and ultimately approving of ICANN as newco).

    Twomey controls the GAC. ICANN staff defers to the GAC as if the GAC were the board of directors.

    Now, ICANN authorizes $75k to GAC, which inevitably will be paid to Twomey and Magaziner.

    What's the real deal?

    Re: Conspiracy? (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Thursday, August 15 @ 07:16:50 MDT
    Given that Twomey is no longer employed by the Australian government nor does he represent the Australian government in the GAC, one has to ask why he is involved at all???

    Perhaps ICANN decided ... (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Thursday, August 15 @ 14:24:54 MDT
    That the best way to disarm the GAC would be to turn it into another ICANN board. That means it would need conflicts of interest, sleazy people, and board squatting.

    So they get this guy then ... I could have been really catty in this comment, I pulled my punch!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com