| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN Executive Committee Votes Funds to GAC
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 8 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
ICANN loves the GAC. When looking at redelegation reports, the factor most heavily weighed (in fact, almost exclusively weighed) is compliance with GAC Principles. However, the board never adopted the GAC principles. The GAC principles is just a document by an advisory panel to which the ICANN staff always defers.
The ultimate query relevant to this thread is why ICANN is so deferential to the GAC. What is Paul Twomey’s role? What should the GAC role be? I think it should be merely advisory.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
