| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Survey on .EU policy
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 13 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
You apparently don't understand much about datamining. Nevertheless, yes, it is a completely clueflscked survey. I challenge them to put it up for peer review, with true peers who understand real scientific methodology, and see what happens. They'd be laughed out of scienceville and lose their accreditation, if they had any, which they don't. On the net one needn't wait for such a trial before publication in some prestigious journal, one simply puts it forward as TRUTH, to compete with all the other TRUTH's out there. So far, ICANN is at least breaking even at that game, partly because they understand that that old paradigm is dead. One no longer has to show one's work, one no longer has to wait to be replicated by independent researchers, one simply injects it into the datastream, and whatever cache one has carries it along. The trick is to corrupt whatever cache they have left, precious little I admit, but still not an easy nut to crack. -g
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
