| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Republican Senators Express Concern Over Renewall of ICANN Contracts With DoC
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 27 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
The first wrong was giving ICANN the assignment of increasing competition through the creation of new registries. They've done it slowly, badly, and very little. Most of that can't be undone, the best one could hope for is that they change direction. There are no signs that that will happen any time soon. So to fix the first wrong to the extent that it can be, ICANN should either be told in no uncertain terms to follow through at speed with its assigned task, or it should be taken away from them. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re: My own take
by fnord
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|