| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Building the alternative to DNS
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 26 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
This idea looks like it should be published somewhere. If it is, please post the citation.
I'm aware of ideas of this sort, but I haven't followed any of them in detail. After I've studied the post carefully, and read whatever articles I can find, I'll post some evaluation. There are lots of details to be concerned about:
- What are the detailed tradeoffs between key-size, security, and latency?
- What do we do about a rare, but occasional, collision of hashed fingerprints?
- Do we need a central repository to make sure that entries don't get completely lost? Part of the question here is whether the loss of an entry is considered harmful only to the handle owner (who can republish), or whether it could be harmful to the public.
Mike O'Donnell
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|