| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Auerbach wins!
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 32 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
In their official statement ICANN says:
The ultimate effect of the Court order is essentially the same as the ICANN
procedure that Mr. Auerbach refused to follow.
From which it seems reasonable to conclude that they don't see any need to
appeal. Assuming they really mean it, of course...
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right, given that they claim concern in the press release about expending limited resources, why spend even more if they've been vindicated? They probably wouldn't have to drag an appeal all the way to November, how long will it take a single individual to go through thousands of documents? Particularily if ICANN is using a, dare I say it, alternative filing system. -g
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
