ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    New TLDs and the Ben Edelman Report | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 33 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: New TLDs and the Berkman Report
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday July 29 2002, @06:43PM (#8201)
    User #2810 Info
    Well, those people who wanted those names for actual use may not even have shown up, because, as I think you've also pointed out, not everyone wants a name at the same time. And there wasn't a great hullabaloo about these names, either ICANN's new TLDs or open ccTLDs, becoming available outside of the usual circles. What coverage there was about the process was confusing even to many in the usual circles. And remains so. Will there be an .info LR3? What happens to the .info and .biz names warehoused by registrars? What does .cc stand for this week?.

    But assuming such folks did hear about it, and did line up, they weren't likely to be successful because of speculators and trademark holders. That is what the data appears to support, mamy of the perceived 'good' names are already gone to speculators and trademark holders. I fail to see how adding more open, undifferentiated TLDs will solve this problem unless one has so many of them that speculation at least, if not trademark concerns (and that's a given with ICANN much as I don't like it), becomes uneconomical. That would require perhaps at least 100 new TLDs per year, and that for a few years, to have an effect. Those same speculators now sitting on .com names, or .info and .tv names, that are halfways between a new, short memorable address and a 23 character .com address will simply move their knowledge, resources, and in some cases tricks of the trade, over to other perceived 'better' names in the new TLDs.

    So I suppose eventually there might be a shakeout and everyone could move up a few notches, but how useful is it to have to play musical chairs and repeatedly change addresses, or have multiples? It seems to me the only way this could work is to throw it pretty much wide open all at once, a few hundred new TLDs (and even those would have inevitable trademark restrictions), and if you do that I think you do considerably increase the risk of registry failure and/or instability, which could be lessened somewhat by having a few registries in control of the names. One can guess VeriSign would be one of them. NeuLevel and Afilias too, perhaps. Somehow that doesn't sound too appealing so far. :) -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com