ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    New TLDs and the Ben Edelman Report | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 33 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: New TLDs and the Berkman Report
    by Anonymous on Sunday July 28 2002, @04:51PM (#8142)
    Ben Edelman has repeatedly disgusted me with his thinly veiled advocacy, masquerading as objective research.

    Ben, I'm sorry, but you're offensive in your quasi-covert approach. You also promote far too much regulation and seek to impose your will upon the enduser. Who are you to tell the next manufacturer of widgets that it has to be restricted because "there are already too many widgets"? What form of political ideology do you espouse, anyway? Whatever it is, it is either extremist-Right or extremist-Left. In the end, it all becomes the same thing. It seeks to make decisions for all the "little people" and seeks to dictate the market. I find it, and ultimately you, offensive. I have for a long time, and appreciate this analysis by Milton Mueller.

    You're out of your league. Nice try, but you fall severely short and tip your cards way too much. Your subjectivity is smattered all over the table for everyone to see. I know there are Edelman advocates on this board, but they just don't see the ideology that regulates your flawed research.

    You cite that someone has registered 50 common nouns. So what? 1) who are you to regulate against that? 2) who are you to assume the registrations themselves are inherently illicit? 3) who are you to assume that they are being warehoused? I personally own 140 .com domains and the majority of them lead to distinct websites. By the end of the year I hope to have the remaining number lead to still more distinct websites. They are not mere portals and they are more than mere splash pages. I am not a speculator (not that it is illegal!) or a cybersquatter. Yet you would have them removed from me. And you would seek to deny the next guy easily branded, memorable generics in a fledgling gTLD.

    You don't get it, Ben. You won't. You are ideologically/politically myopic. Your socialist professors really did a number on you. "Restrict! Restrict! Restrict! Dictate terms for the good of the masses! Make the decisions FOR them!" This is what you are doing, Ben. You would do well to move to China.

    Keep your ideology out of your research. It makes you an amateur. I just fear the day your subjectivity is buried more covertly in your research and accompanying narrative. Right now, it can be easily spotted. When you hide more efficiently in the darkness and create a stronger air of "objectivity," you will wield far more influence.

    Aren't you even remotely afraid of what you're becoming, Ben? You have let all this exposure granted to you via ICANN's conferences, this forum, media coverage, etc., get to your head. Be careful, Icarus. I just hope you're not Klaus Barbie.

    Sorry for the hyperbole, but analogies are often understood better through exaggeration.

    You seek too much influence, Ben. And you endorse those who would seek to microgovern.

    I suppose your socialist professors did no justice on the founding of democracy.

    Okay, now give me your spin.

    (My apologies if, under all this stuff, you're really a nice guy. On one level, you seem it.)






    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: New TLDs and the Berkman Report
    by Anonymous on Monday July 29 2002, @03:25AM (#8148)
    No one else out there is really making an attempt to do the same kind of research that Ben does. It seems that some readers of this site get all bent out of shape any time any says that new TLDs aren't necessary. Well, they just aren't. Until Joe and Jane Sixpack start to learn more about the Internet and realize that .info and .biz exist, we should not add more TLDs. Let's see if .org can become popular again, and lets use the country-codes gone generic TLDs .tv, .cc, .ws before we bother with adding new ones.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: New TLDs and the Ben Edelman Report
    by Anonymous on Thursday August 01 2002, @03:17AM (#8257)
    Ben Edelman is a lowlife.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com