| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
SnapNames Response to Names Council Wait Listing Service Report
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 20 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Those domains that should have dropped months (and even years) ago will probably have a WLS placed on them because if VeriSign thinks they're valuable, so will those who pick up dropped names. That is why VeriSign is warehousing them. Once the WLS is in place they will magically appear. If there is no WLS placed on some of them VeriSign might as well drop them as clearly no-one really wants them. Perhaps someone will come along eventually and VeriSign will still make $6. Your average individual can't beat either the existing namedrop services or the WLS to desirable dropped names, that is and will remain in the hands of the few. If you want to be one of those few, waiting for a name to drop and then going to a registrar of your choice to pick it up will only work for those names which aren't desirable, the good ones are gone in seconds. And if it isn't desirable then there won't be a WLS placed on it and you can take your time. It is misleading to argue that some existing namedrop services may charge less than the WLS by pointing to a given fee. Assuming one could aggregate all these fees, which is difficult with some using bidding models, etc., one might get a truer picture of the existing cost to someone to lock up the registration on a dropped name. Simply using one, or even a few, is no guarantee. That total cost is well above the WLS fee. That is no reason to bring in the WLS, but it is a poor argument to use against it. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|