| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
SnapNames Response to Names Council Wait Listing Service Report
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 20 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
When I talked to ICANN for an domain name that has expired for two years yet has not beed deleted from networksolution.com, I was told that the registrar has the right to decide when the domain name shall be deleted. Yeah right, how about other registrars? They have to delete the domain names within a short period time. It seems to me that other registrars are not in the same position as networksolutions is. Obviously networksolutions gets favors from icann.
ICANN acts like a rep of networksolutions. What a shame.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|