| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Who is the .org consultant?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 21 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I don't know whether they are going to get it or not - that has yet to be decided.
But don't you wonder about the ethics of those who make an application that has a board seat reserved for one of icann's directors after he leaves icann's board?
And don't you wonder about the ethics of an ICANN that would quietly accept and consider such an application rather than throwing it back into the applicant's face?
Don't you wonder about the ethics of an icann that does not have a policy that prevents its directors, officers, and employees from taking jobs with those who have won favor from ICANN?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
|
At what point did I say that I thought Organic Names was going to get .ORG?
I don't believe I ever said that.
++Peter
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
