ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Directi warehousing .info LR2 names | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 41 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: So wouldn't the WLS help then?
    by Anonymous on Wednesday July 17 2002, @01:12AM (#7928)
    In your scenario, the WLS should help with some of these names, because once they expire users would have an opportunity to register them rather than the names landing in the pockets of speculators.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: So wouldn't the WLS help then? by Anonymous
    Re: So wouldn't the WLS help then?
    by unsolicited (unsolicited@audomainnews.info) on Wednesday July 17 2002, @01:50AM (#7931)
    User #3378 Info | www.audomainnews.info
    um...yes but they didn't expire did they? They were newly released by Afilias after their less than successful first attempt at Landrush. Also WLS is a Verisign product that would apply to com, net & org names only (at least in its current incarnation).
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: So wouldn't the WLS help then?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Wednesday July 17 2002, @02:05AM (#7933)
    User #2810 Info
    I don't think the WLS will help at all. Certainly not with these new TLD names which won't be part of it anyway, the WLS is presently proposed for .com and .net only. Athough, if WLS is allowed (and I give that a better than 50% chance because it has minority support, that's how ICANN works) I expect it to spread. Then these fine upstanding examples of business ethics and internet governance can sell the name to still one more person who may well never get it. Incredible.

    As for the WLS I've ranted about that a lot and don't want to repeat myself too often, but SnapNames admits that half their current customers are speculators, the WLS will just be a better tool for speculators. They're the first to the names now (or were, till the registrars kept them as is now happening). They'll still be the first to them. And it mostly won't be speculators in the sense of someone just buying a name for resale, it will be those who want to use the domain to continue to catch its former traffic and make a few cents a click, usually by forwarding them to pr0n and gambling sites. That's what these fine upstanding examples of business ethics and internet governance, and their overseer the USG, consider progress. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com