ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    When Consensus Doesn't Matter, and What Does | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 11 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: When Consensus Doesn't Matter, and What Does
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Monday July 15 2002, @09:05AM (#7867)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    What a fantastic essay! It conclusively demonstrates that the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin is indeed 14! ICANN should call this consensus and move forward immediately!

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: When Consensus Doesn't Matter, and What Does
    by Anonymous on Monday July 15 2002, @10:53AM (#7875)
    In ICANN, consensus is whatever Joe Sims and Stuart Lynn want. The board will rubberstamp it and issue a press release claiming "overwhelming consensus".

    Was there a consensus for the UDRP? No. But we got a UDRP.

    Was there a consensus for the process through the famous seven TLDs were picked? No. But we got it anyway.

    Was there a consensus for handing .com to NSI forever? No. But that also happened.

    Was there a consensus for elected board seats? Yes. And the response? ICANN eliminated elected board seats.

    Was there a consensus in the DNSO for how .org should be handled? Yes. The response - ICANN ignored it.

    The list is like the Eveready bunny - it just keeps on going.

    Consensus is a fantasy that is nothing but an excuse for the arbitrary imposition of whatever choice ICANN wants to make.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Equally Important
    by Anonymous on Monday July 15 2002, @01:13PM (#7878)
    This from the ICANN forum on New TLD Evaluations:

    Register.com used multiple lists for various kinds of clients.
    1. Register.com - standard list
    2. Net Searchers
    3. Virtual Internet
    4. BestRegistrars

    The Lubsens did the same with DomainBank and DomainPro as far as I can make out. If the Afilias CEO is involved in multiple-lists, then it's not surprising other people are too.


    The important part of this post is: "If the Afilias CEO is involved in multiple-lists, then it's not surprising other people are too."

    We have consensus that Afilias board members and CEO have grabbed valuable .info names for themselves, including fraudulent attempts by at least one Afilias board member. Why does ICANN allow them to continue to run the .info registry? Thanks Vint! Thanks Hans! Thanks Esther Dyson!

    Sincerely,

    A Play-By-The-Rules, average webmaster trying to build sites.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: When Consensus Doesn't Matter, and What Does
    by GeorgeK on Tuesday July 16 2002, @10:16AM (#7904)
    User #3191 Info | http://www.kirikos.com/
    J. Beckwith Burr is an attorney for SnapNames apparently, see:

    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-transfer/Arc00/msg00333.html

    so that kind of document is very predictable coming from them, as the WLS debate reaches its crescendo.

    A SnapNames "partner" bucked from the pack, and came out against WLS today. See:

    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-transfer/Arc00/msg00370.html
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com